Latest fraudulent alert - last updated on Apr 2023. To find out more information and how to protect yourself, please click here.

Investment Institute
Macroeconomic Research

Emerging markets Asia: Picking a side

KEY POINTS
EM Asia gained from the US-China trade war, widening US surpluses and attracting Chinese investment. If he wins, Trump may punish South-East Asia’s role in enabling Chinese firms’ indirect exports to the US
Korea and Taiwan could face a more challenging environment in any change of US security arrangements

A friend of the enemy

Emerging markets (EM) Asia will be closely watching the US presidential election. While we see few direct impacts from a Kamala Harris win, a Donald Trump victory would likely pose several challenges for the region.

EM Asia broadly benefited from the 2018-2019 US-China trade war, not only enjoying a more competitive position vis-à-vis Chinese exporters to the US but also attracting foreign investment from firms engaging in “China + 1” strategies and investment from Chinese firms seeking to diversify their supply chains (and circumvent US tariffs).

The region’s favourable position can be attributed to its success in avoiding picking a side. However, if Trump wins, the risk of an escalation in the US-China trade war could see key markets in the region find it difficult to continue to reside in this sweet spot. Trump would be unlikely to tolerate what he may deem an increasingly one-sided relationship with markets that have seen trade surpluses with the US widen and benefited from US regional security backing but simultaneously have built closer economic ties with China. EM Asia could therefore face a tougher trading environment with the US and a reassessment of existing security arrangements if Trump is re-elected.

The region now has a much wider trade surplus with the US than in Trump’s first term (Exhibit 6). While some of EM Asia’s gains have come at the expense of China, this also reflects a rewiring of Chinese supply chains to circumvent US protectionist policies, with South-East (SE) Asian nations being notable conduits. This has already played out in solar panels –

a decade or so after the 2012 US tariff hike on Chinese solar panels, SE Asia now accounts for around 80% of all US solar panel imports, much of which is linked to Chinese firms. In August 2023, the US Department of Commerce (DoC) announced the final determination of a circumvention inquiry that found Chinese producers were shipping solar products through these markets for minor processing to avoid paying anti-dumping and countervailing duties.

China’s investment in SE Asia manufacturing facilities has also picked up in recent years. Its total outward direct investment position in Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia combined rose from US$16bn in 2018 to US$37bn in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund data. More recently, fDi Intelligence reported that in 2023 China pledged US$26.4bn in greenfield projects in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, up from an annual average of US$7.7bn in 2014-2022. This makes it challenging for the DoC to identify and contain Chinese efforts to circumvent trade tariffs. Tougher anti-China policy could include blanket tariffs on nations deemed to be benefiting from close ties with China (particularly those enabling China’s tariff evasion) – and EM Asia will be a prime target. Complicating further, EM Asia will also need to be wary of cheap Chinese imports; Indonesia has already taken action, imposing tariffs of up to 200% on some Chinese goods.

In addition to hiking tariffs on so-called unfair trade covering China-linked imports, there is a broader risk any future trade negotiations or disputes with a new Trump administration could include threats to withdraw US security commitments, or demand greater contributions towards existing arrangements.

In particular, Korea and Taiwan have also seen trade surpluses with the US widen and these could attract a protectionist response, given Taiwan’s dominant position in semiconductor manufacturing and Korea’s rising vehicle exports to the US. A harbinger of a more complicated relationship with the US was Trump’s comments in July that Taiwan should pay the US for protection from China, while also bemoaning Taiwan’s dominance in global semiconductor trade. Tellingly, in his first term, Trump accused South Korea of free riding on US security support and renegotiated the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) accordingly.

Exhibit 6: US deficit with EM Asia greater than that with China
Download the PDF to read the full article
Download the full article (534.5 KB)
Eurozone – High stakes amid political fracture risks
Macroeconomics Macroeconomic Research

Eurozone – High stakes amid political fracture risks

Investment Institute
China – Eyes on trade fragmentation
Macroeconomics Macroeconomic Research

China – Eyes on trade fragmentation

  • by Yingrui Wang
  • 19 September 2024 (5 min read)
Investment Institute
US 2024 presidential election: The potential global impact
Macroeconomics Macroeconomic Research

US 2024 presidential election: The potential global impact

Investment Institute

    Disclaimer

    This website is published by AXA Investment Managers Asia Limited (“AXA IM HK”), an entity licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”), for general circulation and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments, nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy, sell or enter into any transactions in respect of any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal, tax or any other advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalised recommendation to buy or sell securities under any applicable law or regulation. It has been prepared without taking into account the specific personal circumstances, investment objectives, financial situation, investment knowledge or particular needs of any particular person and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Offering may be made only on the basis of the information disclosed in the relevant offering documents. Please consult independent financial or other professional advisers if you are unsure about any information contained herein.

    Due to its simplification, this publication is partial and opinions, estimates and forecasts herein are subjective and subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee such opinions, estimates and forecasts made will come to pass. Actual results of operations and achievements may differ materially. Data, figures, declarations, analysis, predictions and other information in this publication is provided based on our state of knowledge at the time of creation of this publication. Information herein may be obtained from sources believed to be reliable. AXA IM HK has reasonable belief that such information is accurate, complete and up-to-date. To the maximum extent permitted by law, AXA IM HK, its affiliates, directors, officers or employees take no responsibility for the data provided by third party, including the accuracy of such data. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision. References to companies (if any) are for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as investment recommendations or solicitations.

    All investment involves risk, including the loss of capital. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and that past performance is no guarantee of future returns, investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Investors should not make any investment decision based on this material alone. 

    Some of the services listed on this Website may not be available for offer to retail investors.

    This Website has not been reviewed by the SFC. © 2024 AXA Investment Managers. All rights reserved.