Latest fraudulent alert - last updated on Apr 2023. To find out more information and how to protect yourself, please click here.

Investment Institute
Macroeconomics

Strike Price

  • 16 October 2023 (7 min read)

  • We explore the risk of a further rise in oil prices after the terror attack against Israel
  • Strikes have hit their highest level in 20 years in the US. We look at real wages to gauge the risk of an inflationary catch-up in pay. The UAW strike is also illustrative of the challenges of re-industrialising amid an energy transition

The disappointing inflation print for September in the US may not be too alarming. It could be mere mean reversion after a “too good” August print. Yet, we cannot exclude that a line of resistance is emerging, under a “pincer movement” from higher oil prices combined with a still tense labour market generating persistent wage pressure.

The tragedy in Israel has raised the risk that oil prices rise further. The market reaction has been measured so far, as the lack of unity of the Arab world – a difference with the 1970s – limits the ramifications through OPEC. It is a very volatile situation though as the market ponders the effect of the likely ground operation by Israeli forces in Gaza. The capacity of the US to control the escalation is going to be crucial, but that is what Joe Biden is clearly attempting.

When it comes to endogenous inflationary forces in the US, the intensification of strikes calls for attention. A key issue though is to determine whether there is still a significant real wage gap in the US which could unleash a catch-up ahead. Average wages deflated by headline inflation have been marginally exceeding their pre-Covid level since the end of last year. Non-supervisory and production workers have seen more substantial gains, and after three years of gyrations their real wage is today roughly where it should be when prolonging the trend observed between the end of the GFC and Covid. This should bring a measure of reassurance on the capacity to tame inflation.

The interest in the strike in the auto sector goes beyond the inflation issue. Indeed, we think it illustrates very well the challenges of reindustrialisation in a context of energy transition. Still, at least the US has stopped the decline in manufacturing jobs – even before IRA. This helps with the social difficulties of sectorial reallocation. People working in manufacturing may not always be able to keep their current job, but they have a higher chance to find a similar job than during the big industrial contraction of the 1990s/2000s.

Download full article
Download report (572.04 KB)

Related Articles

Macroeconomics

Letter from China

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 15 April 2024 (10 min read)
Macroeconomics

Saved by Supply

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 08 April 2024 (7 min read)
Macroeconomics

Remember “Trumpnomics”?

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 11 March 2024 (10 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This website is published by AXA Investment Managers Asia Limited (“AXA IM HK”), an entity licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”), for general circulation and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments, nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy, sell or enter into any transactions in respect of any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal, tax or any other advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalised recommendation to buy or sell securities under any applicable law or regulation. It has been prepared without taking into account the specific personal circumstances, investment objectives, financial situation, investment knowledge or particular needs of any particular person and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Offering may be made only on the basis of the information disclosed in the relevant offering documents. Please consult independent financial or other professional advisers if you are unsure about any information contained herein.

    Due to its simplification, this publication is partial and opinions, estimates and forecasts herein are subjective and subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee such opinions, estimates and forecasts made will come to pass. Actual results of operations and achievements may differ materially. Data, figures, declarations, analysis, predictions and other information in this publication is provided based on our state of knowledge at the time of creation of this publication. Information herein may be obtained from sources believed to be reliable. AXA IM HK has reasonable belief that such information is accurate, complete and up-to-date. To the maximum extent permitted by law, AXA IM HK, its affiliates, directors, officers or employees take no responsibility for the data provided by third party, including the accuracy of such data. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision. References to companies (if any) are for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as investment recommendations or solicitations.

    All investment involves risk, including the loss of capital. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and that past performance is no guarantee of future returns, investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Investors should not make any investment decision based on this material alone. 

    Some of the services listed on this Website may not be available for offer to retail investors.

    This Website has not been reviewed by the SFC. © 2023 AXA Investment Managers. All rights reserved.