Investment Institute
Viewpoint Chief Economist

BoE breaks ranks

  • 07 November 2022 (5 min read)

  • While the Fed is open to a higher terminal rate, the Bank of England (BoE) “dares to differ”.
  • Beyond a likely “fiscal paralysis” – which may not be entirely bad news given the state of the US economy – the mid-term US elections could herald some future headaches, even if another debt ceiling drama can be avoided.

Unless the data gets truly terrible on inflation next month, the Fed will probably go for 50bps “only” in December, but the key issue, as Powell said, no longer is how quickly but how far and for how long. While the Fed sought to control any overly dovish interpretation of their imminent shift to a more cautious pace of tightening by talking up the possibility of raising the terminal rate, the Bank of England chose to push the market to consider that it has been over-estimating the total amount of tightening needed to bring inflation back under control. This difference may stem from the BoE’s awareness of looming fiscal austerity in the United Kingdom (UK), which would make the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) ready to take a measured risk with the exchange rate by diverging from the Fed’s rhetoric. Of course, if the United States (US) economy starts softening fast, any “policy gap” becomes easier to maintain. We look at the recent US labour market dataflow. It has become quite ambiguous, with signs of softness co-existing with persistent evidence of overheating. There is still no “smoking gun” there which could trigger a downward revision in the expected terminal rate.

The European Central Bank (ECB) President’s speech last week was on the hawkish side in our opinion. The message on a shallow recession not being enough to tame inflation on its own is understandable “in substance”, but the communication effect is quite striking: if a shallow contraction does not suffice, then a legitimate question to ask the ECB is whether it is actively seeking to engineer a deep recession by going far into restrictive territory.

If the Democrats this week lose the House, or both the House and the Senate, there are technical ways to avoid another “debt ceiling drama” if the Biden administration can make good use of the “lame duck session”. Yet, the main consequence of the mid-term elections may lie in the intensification of the political confrontation in the US in the run-up to the presidential elections of 2024, in particular on voting procedures.

Related Articles

Viewpoint Chief Economist

Hawks don’t Hibernate

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 19 December 2022 (7 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Independence Days

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 21 November 2022 (5 min read)
Viewpoint Chief Economist

Plumbing issues

  • by Gilles Moëc
  • 24 October 2022 (7 min read)

    Disclaimer

    This website is published by AXA Investment Managers Asia Limited (“AXA IM HK”), an entity licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (“SFC”), for general circulation and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments, nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy, sell or enter into any transactions in respect of any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal, tax or any other advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalised recommendation to buy or sell securities under any applicable law or regulation. It has been prepared without taking into account the specific personal circumstances, investment objectives, financial situation, investment knowledge or particular needs of any particular person and may be subject to change at any time without notice. Offering may be made only on the basis of the information disclosed in the relevant offering documents. Please consult independent financial or other professional advisers if you are unsure about any information contained herein.

    Due to its simplification, this publication is partial and opinions, estimates and forecasts herein are subjective and subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee such opinions, estimates and forecasts made will come to pass. Actual results of operations and achievements may differ materially. Data, figures, declarations, analysis, predictions and other information in this publication is provided based on our state of knowledge at the time of creation of this publication. Information herein may be obtained from sources believed to be reliable. AXA IM HK has reasonable belief that such information is accurate, complete and up-to-date. To the maximum extent permitted by law, AXA IM HK, its affiliates, directors, officers or employees take no responsibility for the data provided by third party, including the accuracy of such data. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision. References to companies (if any) are for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as investment recommendations or solicitations.

    All investment involves risk, including the loss of capital. The value of investments and the income from them can fluctuate and that past performance is no guarantee of future returns, investors may not get back the amount originally invested. Investors should not make any investment decision based on this material alone. 

    Some of the services listed on this Website may not be available for offer to retail investors.

    This Website has not been reviewed by the SFC. © 2023 AXA Investment Managers. All rights reserved.